Dr. Carol Swain stands as a prominent intellectual and academic, whose journey from poverty to professorship is as remarkable as her insights into contemporary social and political issues. Born in rural southwest Virginia, Swain overcame early adversity, including dropping out of high school and teenage motherhood, to achieve remarkable academic success. She earned five university degrees, secured tenure at Princeton University, and became a full professor at Vanderbilt University, establishing herself as a leading voice in academia and public discourse.
Beyond her distinguished academic career, Dr. Carol Swain has served on numerous prestigious bodies, including three presidential appointments, the Tennessee Advisory Committee to the U.S. Civil Rights Commission, the National Endowment for the Humanities, and the 1776 Commission. Her extensive body of work includes authoring or editing 11 books, with her most recent publication, “The Adversity of Diversity: How the Supreme Court’s Decision to Remove Race from College Admissions Criteria Will Doom Diversity Programs,” addressing critical issues of diversity and inclusion in higher education.
In a recent interview, Dr. Carol Swain shared her expert perspectives with Patrice Onwuka on pressing topics such as the alarming rise of antisemitism on college campuses, the complexities of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, and the crucial importance of achieving True Diversity. This discussion provides valuable insights into the challenges facing universities and American society today.
The Alarming Rise of Antisemitism on College Campuses
The recent surge in antisemitic sentiments on college campuses, particularly following the Hamas attack on Israel, has sparked widespread concern. Dr. Carol Swain, drawing on her extensive experience in academia, asserts that this antisemitic strain is not a new phenomenon but rather a long-standing issue that has been brought to the surface by recent events.
“It’s been there for a long time,” Dr. Swain explains. “The incident that took place with the attack on Israel has allowed what was bubbling—not even below the surface—to come out to the open.” She recounts her own experiences in academia, noting a prevalent pro-Palestinian, anti-Israel sentiment among students and even some Jewish students.
Dr. Swain points to the pervasive indoctrination on college campuses that frames Israel as an oppressor and denies its right to exist. This viewpoint, she argues, is fueled by identity politics, multiculturalism, and DEI programs that often promote misinformation and division. University campuses, she observes, are increasingly fractured into identity-based groups, hindering viewpoint diversity and open debate. Students and faculty who hold dissenting opinions often self-censor for fear of reprisal, creating an environment of intolerance rather than intellectual exploration.
A significant concern for Dr. Carol Swain is the lack of neutrality among university professors, many of whom she describes as activists who openly promote their agendas and encourage students to do the same. This activism, coupled with the prevailing campus culture, contributes to the spread of antisemitic views and stifles balanced discussions on complex geopolitical issues.
Navigating Academic Freedom vs. Combating Hate Speech
The question of how to address antisemitism on campus raises complex issues related to academic freedom and free speech. Dr. Carol Swain clarifies that the issue is not about academic freedom but about distinguishing between protected speech and hate speech.
“Academic freedom and free speech are not the same as hate speech,” she emphasizes. True academic freedom, in her view, should foster environments where diverse perspectives are welcomed and debated. Historically, universities served as marketplaces of ideas, hosting balanced panels and encouraging discussions rooted in historical context and expert analysis.
However, Dr. Swain laments the devolution of academia over recent decades. While the 1980s and 1990s saw more open dialogue, the current environment has become increasingly intolerant. She argues that while academic freedom is crucial, it should not extend to protecting hate speech that lacks academic merit and is driven by biased agendas. Universities, therefore, have a responsibility to address and condemn antisemitism and other forms of hate speech that undermine the principles of academic inquiry and respect.
The Abdication of Responsibility by University Administrations
Dr. Carol Swain is critical of university administrations, asserting that they have “abdicated their responsibility to be the adults in the room.” She observes a trend of administrators deferring to student activists, avoiding their duty to provide leadership and uphold standards. This deference, she argues, has contributed to a campus environment where students, lacking experience and guidance, are effectively “running the campuses.”
The rise of the DEI industry, particularly after George Floyd’s death, has further complicated the issue. While the Civil Rights Act of 1964 aimed to prohibit discrimination, DEI initiatives, in Dr. Swain’s view, have often led to new forms of discrimination and division. She points to examples of racial double standards, resegregation through separate graduations and dorms, and a decline in educational quality.
Dr. Swain contends that the focus on DEI has distracted from the core mission of universities: to educate students in fundamental principles, including constitutional values, free speech, and American ideals. The neglect of these foundational principles has resulted in students who are not well-educated and who are ill-prepared to contribute to American society and compete in the global landscape. She argues that the overemphasis on group identity at the expense of individual merit and viewpoint diversity is detrimental to the overall educational experience and the future of American competitiveness.
Reassessing Affirmative Action and Diversity Programs
Dr. Carol Swain’s recent book, “The Adversity of Diversity,” directly addresses the Supreme Court’s decision to end affirmative action in college admissions. She explains that her concerns about diversity programs predate this ruling, stemming from her observations of their divisive impact and inherent flaws.
Dr. Swain began working on the book five years prior, initially focusing on the failures of diversity training programs. Her research and observations revealed widespread discrimination against certain groups—Asians, whites, men, and Christians—within DEI frameworks, often violating the Civil Rights Act of 1964. She recounts stories of discrimination and denigration based on race and gender, leading her to believe that Supreme Court intervention was necessary.
While acknowledging concerns about potential declines in minority student enrollment, Dr. Carol Swain expresses skepticism that institutions will become “entirely white.” She argues against lowering standards and creating two-tiered systems based on race, emphasizing that qualified minority students exist and can thrive in a merit-based system. Dr. Swain uses her own life story as an example, highlighting her academic success despite her disadvantaged background. She advocates for admitting students as individuals based on merit rather than as representatives of racial or ethnic groups.
Dr. Swain also critiques the socio-economic biases within existing affirmative action practices, noting instances where affluent minority students with lower scores were favored over less privileged but more qualified minority students. She calls for universities to expand their pool of qualified applicants by focusing on improving K-12 education rather than relying on flawed diversity programs.
Defining and Achieving True Diversity
For Dr. Carol Swain, True Diversity goes beyond demographic representation to encompass a diversity of viewpoints and individual talents. She defines True Diversity as an environment that “includes a diversity of viewpoints” and “treats people as individuals.” In such an environment, individuals contribute based on their unique experiences, intellect, and skills, rather than as representatives of specific groups.
Dr. Swain emphasizes the importance of fostering workplaces and learning environments that value individual contributions and encourage collaboration across different perspectives. She contrasts True Diversity with the current divisive climate that pressures individuals to conform to group identities and ideologies. Her personal experience of resisting group categorization and striving to be recognized as an individual underscores her advocacy for a more inclusive and meritocratic approach to diversity.
In conclusion, Dr. Carol Swain’s insights offer a critical perspective on the challenges facing higher education and American society. Her analysis of antisemitism, DEI, and affirmative action, coupled with her vision of True Diversity, provides a valuable framework for fostering more inclusive, intellectually vibrant, and unified communities. Her work encourages a shift from divisive identity politics to a focus on individual merit, viewpoint diversity, and shared values, essential for the future of American excellence and social cohesion.
Click here to learn more about True Diversity.
Mentioned on this page
United StatesHarvard UniversityJewish peopleSupreme Court of the United StatesConstitutionIsraelPrinceton UniversityDiversity, equity, and inclusionVirginiaIvy LeagueUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillGeorge FloydChristiansVanderbilt UniversityNational Endowment for the Humanities
More
