Recently, I published a couple of articles that were critical of Umar Johnson. In those pieces, I questioned his credibility, suggesting he was a charlatan, especially regarding the funds he collected for a school project with seemingly little to show for it. I also strongly implied, if not outright stated, that the self-proclaimed “Prince of Pan-Africanism” might not actually hold the doctorate he claims. I expressed skepticism about whether “Doctor” Umar Johnson had genuinely earned his doctoral degree.
Driven by a commitment to factual reporting, I decided to investigate these claims thoroughly. My investigation into Doctor Umar Johnson’s credentials was not superficial. I delved into yearbooks from institutions he reportedly attended and meticulously reviewed archived graduation programs. Furthermore, I invested personal resources to verify his academic achievements, aiming to confirm whether the title “Doctor” was legitimately earned. To be transparent, while I phrased my initial skepticism by stating I found no concrete evidence of a graduate degree, the underlying implication was clear: I doubted the legitimacy of Doctor Umar Johnson’s title. I understand the power of suggestion in writing and was aware of the conclusions readers would likely draw.
I was wrong.
It has come to my attention, and is now verified, that Umar Johnson does indeed hold a doctorate in psychology. Late last night, the National Student Clearinghouse, a trusted source for degree verification, confirmed his credentials after a detailed review of his records. For those interested in seeing the official confirmation, the verification certificate is publicly accessible here.
This experience highlights a frustrating aspect of dealing with individuals entrenched in their viewpoints, even when faced with contradictory evidence. Like many public figures, some people prioritize saving face over acknowledging error. They can be aware of being incorrect, yet stubbornly persist in their stance, valuing being perceived as right more than truth or mutual understanding. This behavior, often observed in those unwilling to admit fault, reminds me of Donald Trump’s infamous mantra: “Never admit you were wrong. It shows weakness.”
While I acknowledge my mistake regarding Doctor Umar Johnson’s doctorate, it’s crucial to understand the context of my initial skepticism. I have consistently stated, both privately and publicly, that I agree with many of Doctor Johnson’s perspectives, particularly concerning the challenges facing the black community. However, a significant part of my concern stemmed from the fact that many people grant him credibility specifically because he presents himself as “Doctor” Umar Johnson, a doctor of psychology. This title lends an automatic authority in the eyes of many, influencing their acceptance of his views.
My stance remains that a degree, in itself, doesn’t inherently validate or invalidate Doctor Johnson’s arguments. My issue was never with the concept of a “white man’s degree” being necessary for credibility. Instead, it was about the principle of authenticity. Doctor Umar Johnson himself emphasizes his title. Therefore, if his claim to being a doctor were false, it would, in my view, undermine the very foundation upon which he builds his platform.
Some critics might argue that acknowledging his doctorate now inadvertently enhances Doctor Umar Johnson’s credibility. Conversely, his supporters might accuse me of slander and demand retractions. However, I encourage everyone to revisit my previous articles about him and identify any factual inaccuracies beyond the misjudgment of his doctoral status. My aim has always been to call things as I see them, impartially.
My critique of Doctor Umar Johnson has never been driven by personal animosity, and this correction is not an endorsement of everything he represents. I recognize my writing style often incorporates humor and sarcasm, which can be perceived as arrogance. While some may dislike this approach, I remain comfortable with it because I believe in the importance of accountability and admitting when I am wrong. It is a sign of strength, not weakness, to acknowledge errors.
Let me be clear: while I stand corrected on the doctorate, my other concerns regarding Doctor Umar Johnson persist. The fundamental questions about the funds collected for his school remain unanswered. There is still no verifiable evidence of the school’s progress or where the money has been allocated. Furthermore, my criticisms regarding his homophobic and misogynistic rhetoric stand. Similarly, I maintain my skepticism about the extent of his connection to Frederick Douglass and his understanding of the term “descendant.” The allegations of an affair further contribute to a complex and often contradictory public image. I believe he frequently blends personal opinions with factual statements, presenting them as undisputed truths.
Despite these criticisms, it is also important to acknowledge that Doctor Umar Johnson articulates some valuable ideas and perspectives. Dismissing everything he says solely based on the aforementioned concerns would be imprudent. However, I still contend that his message is often diluted by unfounded assertions, conspiracy theories, and divisive rhetoric. I worry that he may exploit individuals seeking guidance who lack critical thinking skills.
Ultimately, I advocate for nuance. It is possible for someone to possess academic credentials and yet still exhibit aspects of charlatanism. The questions surrounding the school funds remain pertinent and deserve answers. I sincerely hope that he does succeed in building a school for black boys, a cause I believe is important. But above all, it is essential to be accurate, and it is now clear: Doctor Umar Johnson is indeed a doctor.
